Skip to main content

"Blonde" dir. by Andrew Dominik


"Blonde"

Where I watched it: Netflix

This is a weird one. It's a bio-pic about Marilyn Monroe but it's based on the fictionalized story of a book that came out in 2000 by the same name.

So first off, why use a real historical figure when the events are fictionalized? I mean, it's forgivable when you put out something like "Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter" because it's obviously satire, but I can guarantee a handful of people are going to walk away from "Blonde" with the assumption that it's based on true events.

Is the story so widely different from the actual life of Marilyn Monroe for it to make a significant difference? Well, yes and no. Its sentiment is clear that a life of fame for a woman mostly recognized in the 1950s for her "beauty" would have been a life of constant harassment and exploitation, but the accounts of historians seem to suggest that Marilyn Monroe had a respectable level of autonomy in her modeling/film career. To strip her of that in this film seems unnecessary and damaging to this particular individual's legacy.

On the flip side, many females trying to work in the modeling and film industry to this day will find horrifically relatable content in this film. Its depiction of predators in positions of power are truly revolting and the filmmaker, Andrew Dominik, doesn't hold back in showing these scenes in explicit detail. The JFK scene is particularly nauseating.

The film is borderline experimental. It jumps from black and white to color and changes aspect ratio completely at will. It jumps between reality and fantasy as "Marilyn Monroe" struggles to maintain her sanity.

It makes sense why someone like Ana De Armas would be chosen for this role, she nails a full spectrum of emotions and really embodies this version of Monroe but for reasons perhaps outside of anyone's control the Spanish accent manages to sneak into each delivery of her dialogue.

This film has some pacing problems, it gets pretty slow at times and it's full runtime is close to 3 hours.

In the end I think the big problem here is that this film ultimately becomes the thing that it is trying to dismantle. It feels sleazy and exploitative of Ana De Armas and Marilyn Monroe. The gratuity of the sexualization feels like it goes above any sense of exemplary purpose. It's the only film on Netflix to have an NC-17 rating and this was a big talking point closer to its release. I think Gaspar Noè's "Love" was rated R (which if you've seen it you know is definitely worthy of an X rating) on Netflix so... it seems a little gimmicky to lure viewers into watching this with the dangling carrot of pornographic material involving Ana De Armas. Like... what difference does an NC-17 rating over R even have on a streaming service?

The film was technically masterful and the score by Nick Cave and Warren Ellis was excellent.

Overall, it's a film that is a challenge to watch for both intentional and unintentional reasons.

5/10

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"The Cursed" dir. by Sean Ellis

"The Cursed" Random pick from Amazon Prime, this actually turned out to be a pretty amazing film. "The Cursed" is a gothic horror set in the late 1800s. After slaughtering and stealing land from a Roma clan, a curse is unleashed on the family and village responsible for the aforementioned atrocities. This film is another one that I'd recommend knowing as little about as possible. It's no secret that this film taps into the werewolf lore that most are familiar with, however it takes some completely new approaches and pushes some serious boundaries in terms of violence and gore. Outside of Boyd Holbrook's awful British accent there wasn't much to not like about this film. It's shot gorgeously and the pacing is somewhere between slow and medium at first but ramps up quite a bit in the last third. 8/10

"Mutant" dir. by John "Bud" Cardos

"Mutant" Forget every vibe you get from the title and poster, this is a zombie movie. "Mutant" is the story of two city bois who go to a small country town to relax and party hard. Nearing the small town they are driven off the road by the local yokels and are forced to hitchhike the rest of the journey with a weird man named Mel who claims that there are aliens visiting the town. Mel is straight up lying to the two city slickers as he damn well knows that he's the root of the problem as he's been experimenting on the townsfolk by slathering them in toxic waste. The end result of Mel's sloppy experimentations is that the town turns into zombies and yep the city bois gotta stay alive long enough for the movie to end. For some reason this movie has a cult following and I'm not sure why. It's got horrible production value, the acting is along the lines of those Italian cannibal movies I just watched and the story is weak even for a zombie movie. Wha...

"Samaritan" dir. by Julius Avery

"Samaritan" Where I watched it: Prime I always appreciate the idea that some people are interested in making/watching superhero movies that are not connected in some way to the Marvel or DC universe. It's kinda rare of course but it does happen... M. Night Shyamalan made his attempt with the Unbreakable trilogy as did James Gunn with Brightburn. That being said, its a difficult task when you're up against films with colossal budgets that have an already hugely established fan base. It requires very outside of the box thinking. I think that's why Brightburn succeeded and the Unbreakable trilogy felt a little too much like a knockoff. A film that tried to think outside the box by taking a test drive in the POV/found footage lane was Chronicle, which was ultimately a garbage movie but I do appreciate the attempts that were made to do their own thing (while doing the exact same things every superhero movie before it did). Samaritan falls into the category of "E f...